next up previous contents
Next: ZND Calculation Results Up: No Title Previous: Driver Calibration

   
Validation Figures


  
Figure: H2-O2-Ar Comparison of [Allen et al. (1995)] Mechanism with Data of [Craig (1966)], [Petersen et al. (1996)], and [Skinner and Ringrose (1966)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-o2/allen/plot.ps, height=5.0in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-O2-Ar Comparison of [Baulch et al. (1992)] Mechanism with Data of [Craig (1966)], [Petersen et al. (1996)], and [Skinner and Ringrose (1966)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-o2/baulch/plot.ps, height=5.0in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-O2-Ar Comparison of [Frenklach et al. (1995)] (GRI) Mechanism with Data of [Craig (1966)], [Petersen et al. (1996)], and [Skinner and Ringrose (1966)]
\begin{figure}\centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-o2/gri/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-O2-Ar Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with Data of [Craig (1966)], [Petersen et al. (1996)], and [Skinner and Ringrose (1966)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-o2/mill-bow/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-O2-Ar Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with Data of [Craig (1966)], [Petersen et al. (1996)], and [Skinner and Ringrose (1966)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-o2/mill-bowc/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-Air Comparison of [Allen et al. (1995)] Mechanism with [Blumenthal et al. (1996)] and [Bhaskaran et al. (1973)] Data
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-air/allen/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-Air Comparison of [Baulch et al. (1992)] Mechanism with [Blumenthal et al. (1996)] and [Bhaskaran et al. (1973)] Data
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-air/baulch/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-Air Comparison of [Frenklach et al. (1995)] (GRI) Mechanism with [Blumenthal et al. (1996)] and [Bhaskaran et al. (1973)] Data
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-air/gri/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-Air Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Blumenthal et al. (1996)] and [Bhaskaran et al. (1973)] Data
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-air/mill-bow/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-Air Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Blumenthal et al. (1996)] and [Bhaskaran et al. (1973)] Data
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-air/mill-bowc/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-N2O-Ar Comparison of [Allen et al. (1995)] Mechanism with [Hidaka et al. (1985a)], [Hidaka et al. (1985b)], and [Pamidimukkala and Skinner (1982)] Data, at 1.5-3 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-n2o/allen/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-N2O-Ar Comparison of [Frenklach et al. (1995)] Mechanism with [Hidaka et al. (1985a)], [Hidaka et al. (1985b)], and [Pamidimukkala and Skinner (1982)] Data, at 1.5-3 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-n2o/gri/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-N2O-Ar Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Hidaka et al. (1985a)], [Hidaka et al. (1985b)], and [Pamidimukkala and Skinner (1982)] Data, at 1.5-3 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-n2o/mill-bow/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: H2-N2O-Ar Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Hidaka et al. (1985a)], [Hidaka et al. (1985b)], and [Pamidimukkala and Skinner (1982)] Data, at 1.5-3 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/h2-n2o/mill-bowc/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-O2-Ar Comparison of [Baulch et al. (1994a)] Mechanism with [Cheng and Oppenheim (1984)], [Burcat et al. (1971)], and [Burcat et al. (1996)] Data, at 2-13 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-o2/baulch/plot1.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-O2-Ar Comparison of [Baulch et al. (1994a)] Mechanism with [Seery and Bowman (1970)] Data, at 1.7-3.4 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-o2/baulch/plot2.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-O2-Ar Comparison of [Frenklach et al. (1995)] Mechanism with [Cheng and Oppenheim (1984)], [Burcat et al. (1971)], and [Burcat et al. (1996)] Data, at 2-13 atm
\begin{figure}\centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-o2/gri/plot1.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-O2-Ar Comparison of [Frenklach et al. (1995)] Mechanism with [Seery and Bowman (1970)] Data, at 1.7-3.4 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-o2/gri/plot2.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-O2-Ar Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Cheng and Oppenheim (1984)], [Burcat et al. (1971)], and [Burcat et al. (1996)] Data, at 2-13 atm
\begin{figure}\centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-o2/mill-bow/plot1.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-O2-Ar Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Seery and Bowman (1970)] Data, at 1.7-3.4 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-o2/mill-bow/plot2.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-O2-Ar Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Cheng and Oppenheim (1984)], [Burcat et al. (1971)], and [Burcat et al. (1996)] Data, at 2-13 atm
\begin{figure}\centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-o2/mill-bowc/plot1.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-O2-Ar Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Seery and Bowman (1970)] Data, at 1.7-3.4 atm
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-o2/mill-bowc/plot2.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-N2O-Ar Comparison of [Frenklach et al. (1995)] Mechanism with [Soloukhin (1971)] and [Drummond (1969)] Data
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-n2o/gri/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-N2O-Ar Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Soloukhin (1971)] and [Drummond (1969)] Data
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-n2o/mill-bow/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: CH4-N2O-Ar Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with [Soloukhin (1971)] and [Drummond (1969)] Data
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/ch4-n2o/mill-bowc/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-O2-Ar Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with Data of [Bull (1968)], [Drummond (1972b)], and [Fujii et al. (1981)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-o2/mill-bow/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-O2-Ar Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with Data of [Bull (1968)], [Drummond (1972b)], and [Fujii et al. (1981)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-o2/mill-bowc/plot.ps, height=5.2in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-O2-Ar Comparison of [Miller et al. (1983)] Mechanism with Data of [Bull (1968)], [Drummond (1972b)], and [Fujii et al. (1981)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-o2/mill-smook/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-O2-N2 Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with Data of [Miyama and Endoh (1967b)] and [Miyama and Endoh (1967a)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-o2-n2/mill-bow/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-O2-N2 Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with Data of [Miyama and Endoh (1967b)] and [Miyama and Endoh (1967a)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-o2-n2/mill-bowc/plot.ps, height=5.2in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-O2-N2 Comparison of [Miller et al. (1983)] Mechanism with Data of [Miyama and Endoh (1967b)] and [Miyama and Endoh (1967a)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-o2-n2/mill-smook/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-N2O-Ar Comparison of [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with Data of [Drummond and Hiscock (1967)] and [Soloukhin (1971)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-n2o/mill-bow/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-N2O-Ar Comparison of modified [Miller and Bowman (1989)] Mechanism with Data of [Drummond and Hiscock (1967)] and [Soloukhin (1971)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-n2o/mill-bowc/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}


  
Figure: NH3-N2O-Ar Comparison of [Miller et al. (1983)] Mechanism with Data of [Drummond and Hiscock (1967)] and [Soloukhin (1971)]
\begin{figure} \centering \epsfig{file=/home/strehlow/GDT/lanl/cv/models/nh3-n2o/mill-smook/plot.ps, height=5.5in, angle=270} \end{figure}

next up previous contents
Next: ZND Calculation Results Up: No Title Previous: Driver Calibration
Joe E. Shepherd
2000-01-17