Experiments have been performed in the GALCIT detonation tube for the following mixtures:
Reaction zone calculations have the advantage of being generally faster and cheaper than experiments and also of being capable of a larger range of conditions and mixtures. However, a number of difficulties prevent the calculations from being straightforward. The first problem is the lack of a comprehensive reaction mechanism for the most general mixtures. In an effort to find or create such a mechanism, we have collected several mechanisms from the literature, and a large amount of experimental data for validation.
The most successful mechanism for the model tank mixtures found so far is a modified version of the the mechanism of [Miller and Bowman (1989)], although it is not as successful at methane oxidation as the GRI-Mech 2.11 [Frenklach et al. (1995)], which can not be used for ammonia oxidation. The mechanisms of [Miller et al. (1983)] and [Miller and Bowman (1989)] can be used for ammonia combustion but are not as useful for hydrocarbon combustion.
Two analysis tools are available for performing chemical kinetics calculations under constant-volume conditions or during steady, one-dimensional, compressible flow behind a shock. The constant-volume calculations are used for validation comparisons with shock tube induction time data, and the one-dimensional dynamical calculations are used to compute the reaction zone thickness in idealized planar detonation waves.
Using the experimental data mentioned above and reaction-zone thickness calculations performed with appropriate mechanisms, cell-width correlations have been created for several mixtures. For limited conditions involving fixed fuel-oxidizer stoichiometry, with variations in initial pressure or dilution, a power law correlation between cell size and reaction zone thickness appears to be very useful. A more general correlation applicable to various fuel-oxidizer systems is more elusive but currently under development.